Planetary CFO
  • Blog/Home
  • About
  • Ideas
  • Rogues
  • A Finance Manual for the Planet
  • Gallery
  • Contact

Planetary CFO

Review of “The Economic Superorganism” by Carey King

16/7/2022

0 Comments

 
Carey King tries to reconcile and synthesise two main competing frames or “narratives” via a conceptualisation of the global human endeavour, the synthesis facilitated by broadly describing the human system as an “economic superorganism”.
 
The first of the two narratives is that of the techno-optimist, expressed through the currently dominant lens of the neo-classical economics view of markets, prices and the hidden hand.

The second narrative is that of the techno-realistic environmentalist, expressed through finite planet, limits to growth environmental economics and so on.
 
King draws on analogies with evolutionary biology in the natural world, as a common thread through the book.  He talks often about energy exploitation and conversion into useful work in the natural world as well as in human activities, infrastructures and ways of organising.  This, and references to material/energy substitution and throughput through the economy, remind me of the work of Fraser Murison Smith (eg “A Planetary Economy”, “Economics of a Crowded Planet”) which tackle some similar topics.
 
King’s book is a valiant attempt at comparison and synthesis.  Does it work?   It’s hard to know. 
 
I agree with just about everything he says. 
 
But I’m left with an impression that he leaves it very open and perhaps says too little about what he thinks will actually happen next.  Is he optimistic or pessimistic about the future?  It’s hard to tell.
 
Will limits to growth realism find its way to setting future global policies and achievable plans for effective stewardship of the earth’s renewable and non-renewable resources in time to avert the worst-case environmental catastrophes, or will collapse, even extinction, be the future of humanity?

King expresses no substantive view about the likely future trajectory of humanity.

And in appearing to be leaning towards the natural world’s seeming ambivalence about the future of humanity, is he abrogating responsibility for taking a positive stance on such matters?  That interpretation would, I think, be a little harsh.
 
After all, I think he is pretty clear where his values and worldview actually leads him.  He regards the downsides evidently caused by the world’s tendency to cling to neoliberalism and markets as being a signal that unabated neoliberalism is not a good way forward at this point.
 
And his concluding paragraphs highlight the need to engage with many aspects of recognising limits to growth.

The missing piece of the jigsaw, for me, is addressing whether positive actions by individuals, groups, communities, businesses and governments can and will make the necessary changes to system structure and direction to enable us to transition successfully into a fair and sustainable future.

He treats some of the relevant issues a little superficially (understandably in a book that tackles such an enormous topic) and leaves the question dangling as a “time will tell”.
 
His final paragraphs summarise via these excerpts:
 
excerpts from book --------------------
“There seems to be a paradox. The low carbon energy solutions appear at hand, yet the economy does not take the steps to actually lower greenhouse gas emissions.  The paradox exists only if we force a false choice between the endpoints of each of the energy and economic narratives of this book.  The paradox vanishes if we think of the global economy as a superorganism."
 
"The most certain way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is to reduce consumption of physical resources, but we seem unwilling (so far) to self-impose this constraint.  One of the main reasons is because the techno-optimistic and infinite substitutability economic narrative, which dominates economic thinking, and thus, also policy design, says we don’t have to.  It does not contemplate physical constraints on long-term growth."
 
"In contrast, the techno-realistic narrative assumes a finite Earth can and will eventually constrain increases in consumption and economic growth…
From an evolutionary perspective, each entity … within the economic superorganism competes against the others within a physical world, and in doing so seeks to remove constraints on itself… This is how the superorganism … ignores the energy narratives of fossil fuels versus renewable energy.  It minimises constraints by using some combination of all types of energy technologies… It will not be surprised at an end to growth.  It expects it.  The difficult questions relate to whether or not we should plan for the end of growth and if so, what such a plan even looks like. 
There are tradeoffs between short-term versus long-term thinking, between markets versus plans, between applying versus removing economic constraints, and between worldviews that consider the economy as a physical system versus those that don’t…” 
excerpts end ------------------------------------ 

I think his book is a very valuable contribution to these discussions, particularly as it highlights some of the ways we can look at human systems through the lens of biological evolution.  This helps us to become more self-aware as a species.  Recognising that there are some key differences between evolutionary biology and how human systems are purposefully created (by us, not by nature) might just enable us to weave our way collectively through what White and Hagens aptly describe as “the bottlenecks of the twenty first century” (in a book with the same title).
 
I’ll leave you with one more set of questions:

Does the paradox King describes really vanish in the way he posits, given the dominant and powerfully incumbent position of the techno-optimistic neo-classical libertarian economic model?

Or are we just kidding ourselves that the paradox will go away by itself, without concerted, conscious effort to confront the paradox and the factors that keep incumbent structures in place and deal with them for the sake of future generations? 

Is King attributing too much confidence in evolutionary pressures, when we know that, for humans, biological evolutionary processes have been largely overtaken by human social collective decision-making processes (good and bad ones)?
 
 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    The Planetary CFO - working towards a sustainable World Balance Sheet.

    Categories

    All
    Climate Change
    Economics
    Inequality
    Land Use
    Migrants
    Sustainability
    The Role
    Transport
    World Balance Sheet

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog/Home
  • About
  • Ideas
  • Rogues
  • A Finance Manual for the Planet
  • Gallery
  • Contact