As per a LinkedIn discussion here:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/david-calver-8974ab_bloghome-activity-7053708117288570880-dYKi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop The draft proposition from Rich Kolm (Project Manager and Scrum Master, Maryland USA) is as follows: Draft 1 "The case for human activity causing dangerous imbalances in the cycle of carbon sequestering is not proven. [something about abundance to be inserted?] The peer review system for science is corrupt and dedicated to suppression of dissenting viewpoints. In contrast, fundamentals of science and direct observation of events lead me to conclude that the IPCC view is fatally flawed due to large gaps in the underlying dataset. My paradigm is to rely on my own observations and knowledge of scientific fundamentals. I conclude that there is no scarcity and no credible evidence of impending crisis."
2 Comments
Rich Kolm
20/4/2023 06:06:37 pm
I suggest that the following rewrite of the opening paragraph will provide better clarity and higher impact and will make this a more direct counterpoint to my proposition:
Reply
David Calver
20/4/2023 07:13:41 pm
Thanks, Rich,
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorThe Planetary CFO - working towards a sustainable World Balance Sheet. Categories
All
Archives
May 2023
|