Steelman proposition from Rich Kolm

As per a LinkedIn discussion here:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/david-calver-8974ab_bloghome-activity-7053708117288570880-dYKi?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

The draft proposition from Rich Kolm (Project Manager and Scrum Master, Maryland USA) is as follows:

​Draft 1
"The case for human activity causing dangerous imbalances in the cycle of carbon sequestering is not proven. [something about abundance to be inserted?] The peer review system for science is corrupt and dedicated to suppression of dissenting viewpoints. In contrast, fundamentals of science and direct observation of events lead me to conclude that the IPCC view is fatally flawed due to large gaps in the underlying dataset. My paradigm is to rely on my own observations and knowledge of scientific fundamentals.  I conclude that there is no scarcity and no credible evidence of impending crisis."